On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:10:11AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 06/24/2013 10:02 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> >> patch. The vast majority chose not to respond to my email to them at
>> >> all. When private email fails, the next step is public email.
>> >
>> > The only problem I have here is that I don't remember about deciding to
>> > publish a list of failures by public email at all. I hope it's not my
>> > memory failing me here, because then I would have to remember why I
>> > didn't speak up against that idea at the time.
>>
>> You didn't decide anything. As the CFM, I did. My job for this month
>> is to make sure that 100% of patches in that queue get reviewed and
>> either committed or bounced by July 15th. I'm doing my job.
>
> +1 for trying the management practices you're trying. After the CF is closed,
> we can step back and treat ourselves to a nice debate about them.
Same here. +1. This method is good to gather in a single, short email
all the information a common user cannot see by watching the
commitfest page, becoming hard to understand globally with a growing
number of pending patches.
--
Michael