Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review
Date: 2015-12-31 00:12:13
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSuDAPziy7eA68fdkBtoz19g8yQGmCPzbq0ttcG4zDABw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Under those circumstances, it seems very dubious to proceed
> with this. Michael seems to think that we can go ahead and start
> changing things and sort out whatever is broken later, but that
> doesn't sound like a very good plan to me.

I meant [snip]tuning those roles during this development cycle.[/snip]
But I'll just withdraw as there are enough concerns, from two
committers on top of it. My point was just to move on with this patch
in the direction where the overall consensus seemed to be at the point
I begun participating in this thread.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-31 00:13:49 Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2015-12-30 23:47:19 Re: pg_hba_lookup function to get all matching pg_hba.conf entries