Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Date: 2013-12-02 11:48:43
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSfN2JKSTbVx4n+f4dGA24DL4kM046n2C5-1shn3wdB4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Maybe that it shouldn't be part of the main regression schedule...
Yes, like isolation tests, it don't see those new tests in the main
flow as well.

> +many from me as well. I think the big battle will be how to do it, not
> if in general.
Yeah, that's why we should gather first feedback about the methods
that other projects (Slony, Londiste, Pgpool) are using as well before
heading to a solution or another. Having smth, whatever small for 9.4
would also be of great help.

I am however sure that getting a small prototype integrated with some
of my in-house scripts would not take that much time though...
Regards,
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2013-12-02 12:10:32 Re: Proposed feature: Selective Foreign Keys
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2013-12-02 11:26:47 Re: Extension Templates S03E11