Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date: 2014-09-04 00:39:41
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSf=K_1B5epPjNXvBVzsWxbw4uJPrL5-b_8xxVNXwdD_Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> I committed the redo-routine refactoring patch. I kept the XLog prefix in
> the XLogReadBufferForRedo name; it's redundant, but all the other similar
> functions in xlogutils.c use the XLog prefix so it would seem inconsistent
> to not have it here.
Thanks! Even that will be helpful for a potential patch doing
consistency comparisons of FPW with current pages having WAL of a
record applied.

> I'll post a new version of the main patch shortly...
Looking forward to seeing it.

Regards,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-09-04 02:25:05 Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop]
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-09-04 00:39:37 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)