Re: Commitfest problems

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest problems
Date: 2014-12-11 23:38:44
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSQ0jr-nEpnh=haaOCacpVffwpFy4H7PP=qL+hA_XHVVA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > How about *you* run the next one, Tom?
>
> I think the limited amount of time I can put into a commitfest is better
> spent on reviewing patches than on managing the process.
>
That's not only your case, I have the same feeling that time is more
productive when being focused on a single task. CFM work take your energy
away from other things, and if a CFM reviews patches he'd tend to miss
things in the patches he looked at.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-12-11 23:41:18 Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-12-11 23:35:55 Re: Commitfest problems