Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 5/20/16 7:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I guess my first question is whether we have consensus on the release
>> into which we should put this. Some people (Noah, among others)
>> thought it should wait because we're after feature freeze, while
>> others thought we should do it now. If we're going to try to get this
>> into 9.6, I'll work on reviewing this sooner rather than later, but if
>> we're not going to do that I'm going to postpone dealing with it until
>> after we branch.
>
>
> Sounds to me that this is part of the cleanup of a 9.6 feature and should be
> in that release.

Yes, I agree. By the way, the patch completely ignores the fact that
some of the modules already had a version bump in the 9.6 development
cycle, like pageinpect. You don't need to create a new version script
in such cases.
--
Michael