Re: advance local xmin more aggressively

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: advance local xmin more aggressively
Date: 2015-01-15 08:08:43
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSCWtEXcRH0BYm3pS_rpp-JaT3QrFhpVm=86LZCoUEhfA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's an updated version, rebased over the pairing heap code that I just
> committed, and fixing those bugs.
So, are we reaching an outcome for the match happening here?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-01-15 08:40:27 Re: hung backends stuck in spinlock heavy endless loop
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-01-15 08:04:50 Re: HINTing on UPDATE foo SET foo.bar = ..;