| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.5 CF1 |
| Date: | 2014-07-02 07:29:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS2zkRSeJqdN2mo-ggpsM+Wi1WUVFQKbYumMUSaMdoTtQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> WAL format & API changes
> I'm not sure what's happening here. Will look more closely, but
> updates are welcome from the people who've been participating in
> the discussion/review.
>
Patch has been reviewed once. Heikki has submitted an updated that still
has some issues, nothing unbearable though IMO. I imagine that there are
still some discussions needed for the potention performance drop that this
patch could create because of the individual memcpy calls that are
performed for each WAL record registration.
Regards,
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-07-02 07:36:14 | Re: Spinlocks and compiler/memory barriers |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-07-02 07:23:50 | Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) |