| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |
| Date: | 2014-12-18 04:12:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS1Pu=z6+0x956GDsER+pUvMGEFJ4FjqWRBbzTtv8gbrw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think that neither pg_control nor xl_parameter_change need to have the info
> about WAL compression because each backup block has that entry.
>
> Will review the remaining part later.
I got into wondering the utility of this part earlier this morning as
that's some remnant of when wal_compression was set as PGC_POSTMASTER.
Will remove.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2014-12-18 05:11:51 | Re: NUMERIC private methods? |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-12-18 04:05:42 | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |