Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> There are currently 20 "Needs Review" and 14 "Waiting on Author" things
> left in the queue, so it's not quite that there's no time left. There
> really isn't very much left to do on this. The rough consensus idea from
> before takes a while to describe, but there was not a complicated
> implementation in that. The overlap with the still possible to commit SET
> PERSISTENT is probably the worst potential issue this is facing now, but
> that's not even a real issue yet.
>
OK thanks for your feedback.

> If you're out of time to work on it and want to back out of here having
> made good progress, that's fine. I'd be tempted to work on this thing
> myself for a bit just to try and finally get it done. If it gets punted
> forward, we'll be right back to facing bit rot and remembering what was
> going on again, which is what killed the momentum toward committing this
> the last time.

I think I will be able to work on that but not before Monday. This depends
also on how REINDEX CONCURRENTLY goes...
--
Michael