| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn() |
| Date: | 2014-06-17 00:47:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS-YtRHKi0gHCkB2L=G9aiVsZg478kRxO_J280dzm66Xw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> From what I've seen in the wild in Japan, Roman/ASCII characters are
> widely used for object/attribute names, as generally it's much less
> hassle than switching between input methods, dealing with different
> encodings etc. The only place where I've seen Japanese characters widely
> used is in tutorials, examples etc. However that's only my personal
> observation for one particular non-Roman language.
And I agree to this remark, that's a PITA to manage database object
names with Japanese characters directly. I have ever seen some
applications using such ways to define objects though in the past, not
*that* many I concur..
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-17 00:53:48 | Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn() |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-17 00:42:48 | Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels |