From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: use_remote_explain missing in docs of postgres_fdw |
Date: | 2013-02-22 11:41:22 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS=NKszvoKBCq_bHPpfv152nKQ7nf8Qw9nc2uiP513pSg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > While testing a bit this feature, I noticed that use_remote_explain is
> > available in the list of options for FOREIGN TABLE and SERVER but this is
> > not specified in the docs:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/postgres-fdw.html
>
> Wups ... for some reason it's "use_remote_estimate" in the docs. Thinko
> on my part probably --- although on reflection, maybe that's a better
> name anyway?
>
Indeed, use_remote_estimate is better. use_remote_explain makes it sound
like an EXPLAIN query would be sent to remote server. That is at least the
first impression I had when testing the feature without reading the docs.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Andreatta | 2013-02-22 13:57:28 | autoanalyze criteria |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2013-02-22 10:43:39 | Re: Review : Add hooks for pre- and post-processor executables for COPY and \copy |