| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: POC: Sharing record typmods between backends |
| Date: | 2017-08-21 01:33:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS=FQiJnjXRrbzdfBixgp_ZN9mxP_m4FvpzEdJPr+b=cA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> I think it'd be a good idea to backpatch the addition of
>> TupleDescAttr(tupledesc, n) to make future backpatching easier. What do
>> others think?
>
> +1
>
> That would also provide a way for extension developers to be able to
> write code that compiles against PG11 and also earlier releases
> without having to do ugly conditional macros stuff.
Updating only tupdesc.h is harmless, so no real objection to your argument.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-08-21 01:37:15 | Re: [RFC] What would be difficult to make data models pluggable for making PostgreSQL a multi-model database? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-08-21 01:18:35 | Re: POC: Sharing record typmods between backends |