Re: pow support for pgbench

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Raúl Marín Rodríguez <rmrodriguez(at)carto(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: pow support for pgbench
Date: 2017-10-30 11:36:41
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRyee=c8fSB1HH4+ODWRG=huCAmkXeJPigiiduYF36UzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> Please add this patch to the upcoming commit fest if you would like to
>> get some feedback:
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/
>>
>> I am adding as well Fabien in CC who worked in getting the internal
>> function infrastructure in the shape it is now (waaay better) with
>> commit 86c43f4.
>
> I think Raúl would do well to review this patch by Fabien
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/alpine.DEB.2.20.1710201835390.15170@lancre
> which adds a few functions and operators.

Good idea. pow() is not added by Fabien's patch, but an operator for
pow() could be something to add as well.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-10-30 11:50:13 Re: How to implement a SP-GiST index as a extension module?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-10-30 11:27:51 Re: Current int & float overflow checking is slow.