Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes
Date: 2015-01-15 12:06:53
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR9Wk8ueQy-JOg7pFhiS8XK-okEzCc8Z=YzpDi5L9W3MQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I'm not sure. On the one hand it's unclear why fillfactor should be
> different from 9.4.
> On the other hand it's unclear why it should be different from btree.
> I propose marking this "ready for committer". So, committer can make a final
> decision.
OK let's do so then. My preference is to fully pack the index at
build. GIN compression has been one of the headlines of 9.4.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Воронин Дмитрий 2015-01-15 12:22:03 Re: ereport bug
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-01-15 12:04:24 Re: hung backends stuck in spinlock heavy endless loop