| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Including replication slot data in base backups |
| Date: | 2014-04-08 07:08:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqR42HCxLzVW5NL0KUSddeCBCTj-7JdHbGEM8KRshJeBbg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Not sure if this is exactly the right way to do it, but I agree that
> something along those lines is a good idea. I also think, maybe even
> importantly, that we should probably document that people using
> file-copy based hot backups should strongly consider removing the
> replication slots by hand before using the backup.
Good point. Something here would be adapted in this case:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/backup-file.html
I am attaching an updated patch as well.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 20140408_basebackup_slot_doc_v2.patch | text/plain | 1.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-04-08 08:49:04 | Re: Why is it not sane to pass ExecStoreTuple(shouldFree=true) for tuples point into buffers |
| Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2014-04-08 07:01:24 | Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass |