Re: obsolete pg_receivexlog note?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: obsolete pg_receivexlog note?
Date: 2014-11-08 05:10:19
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR0+gQQjFFpgkiUbLFfRvXQRKYa61Y7QHRaBp2xr46T=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 11/5/14 7:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 11/5/14 6:54 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> In this paragraph, is it worth mentioning as well that the tradeoff
>>> when using replication slots is to monitor the xlog partition to be
>>> sure it doesn't get full?
>>
>> Might as well.
>
> Committed.
Thanks for adding a note about partitions that may get full.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-11-11 07:14:47 Re: [DOCS] BUG #11661: CASE ELSE is evaluated although condition is true
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-11-08 01:30:52 Re: obsolete pg_receivexlog note?