Re: pg_reorg in core?

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 9:08 AM, sakamoto <dsakamoto(at)lolloo(dot)net> wrote:

> (2012/09/21 22:32), Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Daniele Varrazzo <
>> daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)**gmail(dot)com<daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Josh Kupershmidt
>> <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>> I haven't submitted it to PGXN as I prefer the original author to keep
>> the ownership.
>>
>> Thanks, I merged your patches with the dev branch for the time being.
>> It would be great to have some input from the maintainers of pg_reorg in
>> pgfoundry to see if they agree about putting it in pgxn.
>>
>> Hi, I'm Sakamoto, reorg mainainer.
> I'm very happy Josh, Michael and Daniele are interested in reorg.
>
> I'm working on the next version of reorg 1.1.8, which will be released in
> a couple of days.
> And I come to think that it is a point to reconsider the way to
> develop/maintain.
> To be honest, we have little available development resources, so no
> additional
> features are added recently. But features and fixes to be done (as Josh
> sums up. thanks).
>
> I think it is a good idea to develop on github. Michael's repo is the root?
> After the release of 1.1.8, I will freeze CVS repository and create a
> mirror on github.
> # Or Michael's repo will do :)
>
As you wish. You could create a root folder based on a new organization, or
on your own account, or use my repo.
The result will be the same. I let it at your appreciation

I have received some patches from Josh, Daniele. It should be developed in
> the next
> major version 1.2. So some of them may not be included in 1.1.8 (caz it's
> minor versionup),
> but I feel so appreciated.
>
Great!
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com