| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Date: | 2013-02-23 13:00:14 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQyhwMHeDExqKy03N7=XbGEcS0GQrdZPtNkeDPSje4PPQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > I prefer RESET, especially since it could eventually support RESET ALL
> > MATERIALIZED VIEWS if that turns out to be useful. How does the parser
> > like that?
>
> Isn't reset currently only used for GUCs? I think that makes for a
> strange crossover.
>
it is. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-reset.html
DISCARD would be better.
My 2c.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-23 17:21:06 | pgsql: Rename postgres_fdw's use_remote_explain option to use_remote_es |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2013-02-23 12:55:29 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Andreatta | 2013-02-23 13:11:16 | Re: autoanalyze criteria |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2013-02-23 12:55:29 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |