Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul
Date: 2013-01-23 04:54:07
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQxzCkVqOu6ASOCyP1fa4zM3Mr7vXUvUvN=iRXP24g2Bw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> I found that support for pg_basebackup -R was in the old patch, and I
> haven't done anything for that yet.
>
Sorry, I meant that pg_basebackup -R support was NOT in the old patch, and
I haven't done anything about that.
Typed too quickly...
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-01-23 05:00:23 Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-01-23 04:49:16 Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul