| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: logical changeset generation v3 |
| Date: | 2012-11-21 07:34:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQhG578ai7vPKezBM_sXqiC70pVwDv8o5w5j2e1jOo_-g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>wrote:
> On 2012-11-21 14:57:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
> >wrote:
> > > It implies that snapstate->nrrunning has lost touch with reality...
> > >
> > Yes, I can reproduce in 10-20 seconds in one of my linux boxes. I haven't
> > outputted anything in the logs, but here is the backtrace of the core
> file
> > produced.
>
> Could you run it with log_level=DEBUG2?
>
Let me try.
> Do you run pgbench after youve reached a consistent state (by issuing a
> manual checkpoint)?
>
Yes. I issue a manual checkpoint to initialize the replication.
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2012-11-21 07:47:11 | Re: logical changeset generation v3 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-11-21 07:34:42 | Re: logical changeset generation v3 |