Re: review: tab completion for set search_path TO

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, cb(at)df7cb(dot)de
Subject: Re: review: tab completion for set search_path TO
Date: 2014-06-23 05:39:30
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQSvDNt2_oMV_nLmVfg8bicYt+Y-hEvN=im2ULiTEF6AQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> this patch https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1443 is
> trivial with zero risk.
>
> Patch is applicable without any issues, compilation was without any issues
> too.
>
Just wondering: why creating a new thread for a review and not reply
directly reply to the exiting one? This makes the review/patch submission
flow rather complicated to follow.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Soroosh Sardari 2014-06-23 05:53:38 Add a filed to PageHeaderData
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2014-06-23 05:26:28 Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls