Re: slotname vs slot_name

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Devrim Gunduz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: slotname vs slot_name
Date: 2014-06-05 09:06:42
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQQM8eQxD0E0UwxgF94wY3SJvtha3Nm1fNhV+83dnzdwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2014 10:22 AM, "Devrim Gündüz" <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 10:57 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> > BTW, what about also renaming pg_llog directory? I'm afraid that
>> > a user can confuse pg_log with pg_llog.
>>
>> +1. I hit this while testing 9.4 this week. Should be confusing for many
>> end-users.
>>
>
> +500. We already have two directories that users remove to get free space
> thinking it's safe because it's just log files. We don't need one more :-)
Adding a +1 on top of this already-huge stack.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2014-06-05 09:11:58 Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-06-05 08:57:03 Re: tests for client programs