Re: currawong is not a happy animal

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: currawong is not a happy animal
Date: 2014-01-17 17:55:05
Message-ID: CAApHDvq+cfCs31yfK1-khhO+OkG=psY_6YuC=gCEfvw0Gfd+uA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

>
> On 01/17/2014 12:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>
>>> It looks like what we need to fix the immediate problem is to mark
>>> set_latch_on_sigusr1 with PGDLLIMPORT. Is that the only one of these
>>> symbols we might need to make visible?
>>>
>> We've generally relied on the buildfarm to cue us to add PGDLLIMPORT.
>> Add that one and see what happens ...
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> OK, done.
>
>
Great, that fixes it on my end.

Thanks for fixing those.

Regards
David Rowley

> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mel Gorman 2014-01-17 18:34:25 Re: [Lsf-pc] Re: Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance (summary v2 2014-1-17)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-01-17 17:50:10 Re: currawong is not a happy animal