| From: | Peter van Hardenberg <pvh(at)pvh(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |
| Date: | 2011-12-13 08:06:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAAcg=kV+mfHGf7qkgNoLi00aKYE1aF1suV6krHgD1nsYfa1_Gw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On mån, 2011-12-12 at 16:51 -0800, Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
> You don't need a new PL to do that. The existing PLs can also parse
> JSON. So that's not nearly enough of a reason to consider adding this
> new PL.
PL/V8 is interesting because it is very fast, sandboxed, and well
embedded with little overhead.
My experience with PL/Python and PL/Perl has not been thus, and
although they are handy if you want to break out and run system work,
they're not the kind of thing I'd consider for defining performant
operators with.
I feel PL/V8 has promise in that area.
--
Peter van Hardenberg
San Francisco, California
"Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt." -- Kurt Vonnegut
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joey Adams | 2011-12-13 08:15:40 | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Peter van Hardenberg | 2011-12-13 08:00:43 | Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq |