On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>
>> But if it's deemed to be a
>> problem, I want to see a solution that's actually watertight.)
>>
>
> After Daniel's hunch about pg_dump barfing due to such leftover entries
> proving out to be true, we have one credible explanation (there might be
> other reasons too) for this long standing issue. I see some reports from as
> early as 2004 and some as latest as Feb, 2011!
The 2004 report was in version 7.3, released in 2002. So it's Very
Nearly a ten year old bug, and may very well go back further back in
time.
--
fdr