Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments

From: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments
Date: 2013-06-06 01:23:43
Message-ID: CAAZKuFa3zS1OwZ4m2nXr+skNr9Vw5KR7ksgzd8cvw-SR_+-xZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I didn't see that proposal, link? Because the idea of slowing down
> wal-writing sounds insane.

It's not as insane as introducing an archiving gap, PANICing and
crashing, or running this hunk o junk I wrote
http://github.com/fdr/ratchet

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2013-06-06 02:06:03 Regarding GIN Fast Update Technique
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-06-06 01:10:57 Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments