| From: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables |
| Date: | 2013-02-01 10:22:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAAZKuFZNUW-tEwiLgsJYejv_aoyx+6+YcbtExigeqjPdhR8Sog@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> I noticed the v10 patch cannot be applied on the latest master branch
> cleanly. The attached ones were rebased.
Hello,
I'm just getting started looking at this, but notice that the second
patch relies on contrib/postgres_fdw to apply, but it's not clear to
me where to get the correct version of that. One way to solve this
would be to tell me where to get a version of that, and another that
may work well would be to relay a Git repository with postgres_fdw and
the writable fdw changes accumulated.
I poked around on git.postgresql.org and github and wasn't able to
find a recent pushed copy of this.
Anyway, I'm looking at the first patch, which applies neatly. Thanks.
--
fdr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-02-01 10:34:38 | Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-02-01 10:19:05 | Re: Cascading replication: should we detect/prevent cycles? |