Re: Another review of URI for libpq, v7 submission

From: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another review of URI for libpq, v7 submission
Date: 2012-03-15 21:09:27
Message-ID: CAAZKuFYKZbXhFyXiQOHx87Qq7MbzhN2iaqN_SFCQu3fkCV6Z7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I wonder if there's any evidence as to that mangling the email addresses
> helps to reduce spam at all?  I mean replacing "(at)" back to "@" and
> "(dot)" to "." is piece of cake for a spam crawler.

I suspect we're long past the point in Internet history where such
simple obfuscation could possibly matter.

> Finally, attached is v8.  Hopefully I didn't mess things up too much.

I'll give it another look-over. Do you have these in git somewhere? It
will help me save time on some of the incremental changes.

--
fdr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2012-03-15 21:18:42 Re: Keystone auth in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-03-15 21:07:28 Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt