| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README |
| Date: | 2014-09-27 06:34:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Lf_j2oU862_bJjO=YKtxnuCMHR=fLONqe0T9FPPHhmUg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It isn't. It's a minor point, originally raised by Amit.
I have observed that this patch is in 'Needs Review' state for
next CF. Do you expect any further review from myside? I think
we can use text recommended by Heikki and after that if you
feel something more is still required, then you can update the same
and send an updated patch. I believe it should be in 'Waiting On Author'
state, please do let me know if you feel otherwise.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-09-27 06:36:55 | Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-09-27 05:51:11 | Re: a fast bloat measurement tool (was Re: Measuring relation free space) |