| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction |
| Date: | 2014-09-14 07:00:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LQ9JrJJqRdCzMZXZqxWimi4RM8Phd6mz3=osLf4cxo5Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> This looks like it's squashed one of the very fundamental buffer
> scaling issues though; well done Amit.
Thanks.
> I'll go back to my notes and try to recreate the pathological cases
> that plagued both the 8.3 BGW rewrite and the aborted 9.2 fsync
> spreading effort I did; get those running again and see how they
> do on this new approach. I have a decent sized 24 core server
> that should be good enough for this job. I'll see what I can do.
It will be really helpful if you can try out those cases.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2014-09-14 07:09:00 | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2014-09-14 06:57:01 | Re: Postgres code for a query intermediate dataset |