Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Date: 2014-09-04 02:42:26
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LMzXvC3Ogasy57x-_RnzZAHO4ckjUy_02Ac_NqTFDorw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> Results look pretty good. Does it help in the read-write case too?

Last time I ran the tpc-b test of pgbench (results of which are
posted earlier in this thread), there doesn't seem to be any major
gain for that, however for cases where read is predominant, you
might see better gains.

I am again planing to take that data in next few days.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-09-04 03:36:01 Re: vacuumdb --all --analyze-in-stages - wrong order?
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2014-09-04 02:30:11 Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction