Re: WIP: dynahash replacement for buffer table

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: dynahash replacement for buffer table
Date: 2014-10-14 15:00:45
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Ks1OCPdwapZNwHiqLOuUzzCXg7JB4RXNp-81_hnLzCUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On 2014-10-14 09:30:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > A few years ago I started working on a concurrent hash table for
> > PostgreSQL. The hash table part of it worked, but I never did
> > anything with it, really. Amit mentioned to me earlier this week that
> > he was seeing contention inside the dynahash machinery, which inspired
> > me to go back and update the patch.
>
> Interestingly I've benchmarked similar loads, even on the same machine
> as Amit,

There is one catch here, for these profiles I am using Power-8 m/c
and the load is slightly higher (5000 scale factor).

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-10-14 15:00:47 Re: Shapes on the regression test for polygon
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2014-10-14 14:55:14 Re: Better support of exported snapshots with pg_dump