| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Audit of logout |
| Date: | 2014-07-28 03:22:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KhnBSQMyXYwPH7GDEs+r_LtdVmmCgObZ65zepAPE0nwQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>
> No. If we change it to PGC_SIGHUP, SHOW command does display
> the changed value after a reload. It's the same behavior as other
> PGC_SIGHUP parameters do. Attached patch just changes it to PGC_SIGHUP.
> You can test that by using the patch.
As this patch is marked as Needs Review, so I went ahead and
picked up for review, however after reading mail chain, it seems to
me that there is a general inclination to have a new category in
GucContext for this feature. I don't see the patch implementing the
same in this thread, so I think it is better to move it to next CF
(2014-08).
Whats your opinion?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rainer Tammer | 2014-07-28 05:58:33 | Re: Fwd: Re: Compile fails on AIX 6.1 |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2014-07-27 22:19:45 | Re: SKIP LOCKED DATA (work in progress) |