| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |
| Date: | 2014-03-10 14:31:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+zPq4Ui+6mgqrbwLbvDV8-Lnsju1qVxGr+NJda7_0JvA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> Agreed. Amit, do you have the test setup at hand, can you check the
> performance of this one more time?
Are you expecting more performance numbers than I have posted?
Is there anything more left for patch which you are expecting?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-10 14:33:25 | Re: calculating an aspect of shared buffer state from a background worker |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-10 14:26:23 | Re: on_exit_reset fails to clear DSM-related exit actions |