Re: Changeset Extraction v7.3

On 28 January 2014 21:56, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2014-01-28 21:48:09 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >> I've rebased it here and am hacking on it still.
>> >
>> > Andres and I are going back and forth between our respective git repos
>> > hacking on this, and I think we're getting there, but I have a
>> > terminological question which I'd like to submit to a wider audience:
>> >
>> > The point of Andres's patch set is to introduce a new technology
>> > called logical decoding; that is, the ability to get a replication
>> > stream that is based on changes to tuples rather than changes to
>> > blocks. It could also be called logical replication. In these
>> > patches, our existing replication is referred to as "physical"
>> > replication, which sounds kind of funny to me. Anyone have another
>> > suggestion?
>>
>> Logical and Binary replication?
>
> Unfortunately changeset extraction output's can be binary data...

"system"?
"cluster"?
"full"?
"complete"?

--
Thom