Re: Command Triggers, v16

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, v16
Date: 2012-03-26 20:41:59
Message-ID: CAA-aLv7m6-k+E52HFMLFz33WhFeiXe_qxN==7+=nFOvVmdYU9w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26 March 2012 21:36, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Personally, I am about at the point where I'd like to punt everything
>> and move on.  As nice as it would be to squeeze a few more things into
>> 9.2, there WILL be a 9.3.  If a few less people had submitted
>> half-baked code at the last minute and a few more people had helped
>> with review, we'd be done by now.
>
> Well, wait a minute. There's a difference between half-baked and
> reacting to a review that changes the goal of a patch. My idea of the

I think Robert was referring to patches in general.

Thom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2012-03-26 20:44:18 Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-26 20:38:37 Re: checkpoint patches