| From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Command Triggers, v16 |
| Date: | 2012-03-16 08:48:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAA-aLv7h=wXG=LGNcPtaJQoFykpfLFhHxVoZz4LZkfxgG17+Xg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15 March 2012 21:58, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I don’t understand how functions can return a type of “command
>> trigger”. This certainly works, but I’ve never seen a type consisting
>> of more than one word. Could you explain this for me? This is also
>
> I tricked that in the grammar, the type is called cmdtrigger but I
> though it wouldn't be a good choice for the SQL statement.
Christian sent me a message mentioning that we've pretty much always
had data types consisting of more than one word (e.g. timestamp
without time zone). So I completely retract my question as it's
obviously nonsense.
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2012-03-16 08:55:10 | Re: Command Triggers, v16 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-03-16 08:45:15 | Re: Command Triggers, v16 |