From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby |
Date: | 2015-02-26 13:20:56 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv7LQHKgoFH8PUEcUk9AQo=nf3G6VAE7jBx7S18vtgc5Qw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 February 2015 at 13:08, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2015-02-23 17:09:24 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
> > On 23 February 2015 at 16:53, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > > Comments? This is obviously just a POC, but I think something like this
> > > does make a great deal of sense.
> > >
> > > Thom, does that help?
>
> > Yeah, this appears to eliminate the problem, at least in the case I
> > reported.
>
> I've pushed a somewhat more evolved version of this after more testing.
>
Thanks. I'll give it another round of testing later.
--
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-02-26 14:53:54 | Re: [RFC: bug fix?] Connection attempt block forever when the synchronous standby is not running |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-02-26 13:08:26 | Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby |