Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby
Date: 2015-02-26 13:20:56
Message-ID: CAA-aLv7LQHKgoFH8PUEcUk9AQo=nf3G6VAE7jBx7S18vtgc5Qw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26 February 2015 at 13:08, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 2015-02-23 17:09:24 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
> > On 23 February 2015 at 16:53, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > > Comments? This is obviously just a POC, but I think something like this
> > > does make a great deal of sense.
> > >
> > > Thom, does that help?
>
> > Yeah, this appears to eliminate the problem, at least in the case I
> > reported.
>
> I've pushed a somewhat more evolved version of this after more testing.
>

Thanks. I'll give it another round of testing later.

--
Thom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-02-26 14:53:54 Re: [RFC: bug fix?] Connection attempt block forever when the synchronous standby is not running
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-02-26 13:08:26 Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby