| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.3 |
| Date: | 2014-01-28 21:48:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAA-aLv4_GxGeHWfsQTxypcHR_HYA5USCyihUbMQ5+0HBagkakw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've rebased it here and am hacking on it still.
>
> Andres and I are going back and forth between our respective git repos
> hacking on this, and I think we're getting there, but I have a
> terminological question which I'd like to submit to a wider audience:
>
> The point of Andres's patch set is to introduce a new technology
> called logical decoding; that is, the ability to get a replication
> stream that is based on changes to tuples rather than changes to
> blocks. It could also be called logical replication. In these
> patches, our existing replication is referred to as "physical"
> replication, which sounds kind of funny to me. Anyone have another
> suggestion?
Logical and Binary replication?
--
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-01-28 21:56:20 | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.3 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-01-28 21:39:43 | Re: updated emacs configuration |