Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys

On 25 October 2014 19:19, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:

> On 25 October 2014 13:28, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Thom Brown wrote:
>> > On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> writes:
>> > > > Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose
>> ends
>> > > > you found.
>> > >
>> > > Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion, uses
>> what
>> > > seems to me to be a saner (more extensible) catalog representation,
>> and
>> > > contains assorted other code cleanup. I have not touched the
>> > > documentation at all except for catalogs.sgml, so it still explains
>> the
>> > > old syntax. I have to stop working on this now, because I've already
>> > > expended more time on it than I should, and it still has the serious
>> > > problems mentioned in
>> > >
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/16787.1351053391@sss.pgh.pa.us
>> > > and
>> > >
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/28389.1351094795@sss.pgh.pa.us
>> > >
>> > > I'm going to mark this Returned With Feedback for the current CF.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Does anyone have any intention of resurrecting this at this stage?
>>
>> Not in this room. Do you?
>
>
> I'm not qualified to, but I'm happy to make time to test it when it next
> gets picked up. My email was really just bumping the topic.
>

I should mention that the latest patch no longer applies against git
master, so I can't test it in its current form.
--
Thom