Re: Batch API for After Triggers

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Batch API for After Triggers
Date: 2013-06-18 08:05:56
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLNmZBWkAqxUddYowmaF=eHsEDh9wzbW7HoAyNeGpUFPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17 June 2013 23:30, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> INSERTED and UPDATED could just be views...

Yes, that would be my suggestion.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-06-18 08:41:06 Re: Spin Lock sleep resolution
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-06-18 08:04:47 Re: Batch API for After Triggers