Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits
Date: 2011-11-08 06:59:19
Message-ID: CA+U5nML2RAVoWC0EdoLRC2muAgcNoBvowx0GNBpmf4Lwb_FpsA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> What I was expecting you to do is eliminate
> wal_writer_delay altogether and drive the wakeups entirely off of the
> latch.

Please continue to expect that, I just haven't finished it yet...

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message YAMAMOTO Takashi 2011-11-08 07:24:07 Re: ProcArrayLock contention
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-11-08 05:11:52 Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits