Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL
Date: 2014-12-16 20:56:14
Message-ID: CA+U5nML0e6_xVBEZdiTP+rRPVFmdQNa8MT0D8mm_T2hLx=dr7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16 December 2014 at 18:28, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:

> For the sake of the archives, the idea I had been trying to propose is
> to use a role's permissions as a mechanism to define what should be
> audited. An example is:

My understanding is that was done.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-12-16 21:02:27 Re: [alvherre@2ndquadrant.com: Re: no test programs in contrib]
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-12-16 20:44:47 Re: [alvherre@2ndquadrant.com: Re: no test programs in contrib]