From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Checksums, state of play |
Date: | 2012-03-06 17:00:25 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKvmQVTHhU=wyDRqzTMem-gfbhZp4U1c=STJ728szoc+Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> As to whether we should increment pd_pagesize_version, I'm not sure
> quite what you were saying about that (I think you may have an extra
> or missing word there), but I don't think it's necessary here.
I said this...
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Do you know of any PostgreSQL variant that can set this byte range to
> different values?
Not sure what the missing word is there, so I'll ask again.
Has EDB or anybody else you know of has used the pd_pagesize_version
field for something else, so you'd rather I didn't touch that?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-06 17:13:57 | Re: Checksums, state of play |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-03-06 16:50:53 | Re: Checksums, state of play |