Re: [PATCH 08/14] Store the number of subtransactions in xl_running_xacts separately from toplevel xids

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] Store the number of subtransactions in xl_running_xacts separately from toplevel xids
Date: 2012-11-15 12:07:23
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJqEvx=9Tpb4+LcvK7entgPdy2S-3E4EYAO_jqRXVkE0g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14 November 2012 22:17, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> To avoid complicating logic we store both, the toplevel and the subxids, in
> ->xip, first ->xcnt toplevel ones, and then ->subxcnt subxids.

That looks good, not much change. Will apply in next few days. Please
add me as committer and mark ready.

> Also skip logging any subxids if the snapshot is suboverflowed, they aren't
> useful in that case anyway.

> This allows to make some operations cheaper and it allows faster startup for
> the future logical decoding feature because that doesn't care about
> subtransactions/suboverflow'edness.

...but please don't add extra touches of Andres magic along the way.
Doing that will just slow down patch acceptance and its not important.
I suggest to keep note of things like that and come back to them
later.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-11-15 12:28:58 Re: [PATCH 08/14] Store the number of subtransactions in xl_running_xacts separately from toplevel xids
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2012-11-15 10:51:44 Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay