Re: JSON for PG 9.2

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date: 2011-12-12 21:08:25
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJkRkZ6BE1hhpfULqVBpDrPJn2vBcmHm1vSQRbbGzNaYw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> There are way too many places that assume that the typmod can
> just be discarded.

If true, that probably ought to be documented cos it sounds fairly important.

Where and when is it true?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-12-12 21:22:09 Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-12-12 21:08:04 Re: [PATCH] Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v3