| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: tracking commit timestamps |
| Date: | 2014-11-25 16:51:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJ2ngXijfckYonVWX_Xa_0N_gAYGm3ZLrHhA5YU5+MGrQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 25 November 2014 at 16:18, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Won't the pg_last_committed_xact() on slave + pg_xact_commit_timestamp() on
> master with the xid returned by slave accomplish the same thing?
Surely the pg_last_committed_xact() will return the same value on
standby as it did on the master?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-11-25 17:11:36 | Re: PITR failing to stop before DROP DATABASE |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-11-25 16:31:05 | Re: Replication connection URI? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-11-26 05:30:55 | Re: tracking commit timestamps |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2014-11-25 16:18:35 | Re: tracking commit timestamps |