| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remaining beta blockers |
| Date: | 2013-04-28 09:48:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+p6upbtZ-8XQ7tEd3x-Dhjr6q8CAbNnT3nPyNViU=MbQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 27 April 2013 20:23, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> 2. The checksum algorithm business. Again, we don't get to tinker with
>> that anymore once we're in beta.
>
> I think it's pretty darn clear that we should change the algorithm,
> and I think we've got a patch to do that. So we should be able to
> resolve this relatively quickly.
I'll be working on this today.
> But +1 for adding a checksum
> algorithm ID to pg_control anyway.
Yes, seems best.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-04-28 10:00:33 | Re: Remaining beta blockers |
| Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-04-28 05:06:18 | Graph datatype addition |