From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion |
Date: | 2014-10-29 16:33:57 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+_R=RE3=pAvGke_-7LZajU-MLLHzCzRrZ7j8a4EaE+cQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 29 October 2014 15:43, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> There is a real danger that your "ta-dah" moment sometime in the
>> future contains flaws which need to be addressed, but we now have
>> piles of questionable infrastructure lieing around. If you have
>> similar doubts about anything I'm doing, please just ask.
>
> I think the implication that the infrastructure created to date is of
> questionable utility for parallelism is false and unjustifed.
Huh? I haven't implied that.
Thanks for your wider explanations.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-10-29 16:34:59 | Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-10-29 16:31:16 | Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions |