Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion
Date: 2014-10-29 16:33:57
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+_R=RE3=pAvGke_-7LZajU-MLLHzCzRrZ7j8a4EaE+cQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29 October 2014 15:43, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> There is a real danger that your "ta-dah" moment sometime in the
>> future contains flaws which need to be addressed, but we now have
>> piles of questionable infrastructure lieing around. If you have
>> similar doubts about anything I'm doing, please just ask.
>
> I think the implication that the infrastructure created to date is of
> questionable utility for parallelism is false and unjustifed.

Huh? I haven't implied that.

Thanks for your wider explanations.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-10-29 16:34:59 Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-10-29 16:31:16 Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions